Picture
Here is a summary of recent decisions of the Minnesota Court of Appeals and Minnesota Supreme Court on unemployment benefits.  This week, the Court of Appeals issued three unpublished decisions on unemployment benefits, and reversed the decision of the unemployment law judge in one of those decisions,  The Minnesota Supreme Court, whose decisions for this week have not yet been issued, did not decide any cases involving unemployment benefits last week:


Minnesota Court of Appeals:

1. Tamara Nelson, Relator v. Donnelly Development, LLC and Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondents, A13-1288.  Filed May 19, 2014.

Summary and Outcome: In this certiorari appeal from an unemployment-law judge’s decision that relator is ineligible for unemployment benefits because she was discharged for employment misconduct, relator argues that, despite various problems and negative interactions with the new owner of the apartment building that she managed, she did not commit employment misconduct. We affirm. 

2. Alan Sargent, Relator, vs. Manny Moe & Jack of California, Inc. and Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondents, A13-1669.  Filed May 19, 2014.

Summary and Outcome:

Relator Alan Sargent challenges an unemployment law judge’s (ULJ) decision on reconsideration that he was ineligible to receive unemployment benefits because he had been discharged for employment misconduct. Sargent argues that he did not engage in misconduct but instead committed an unintentional mistake. Sargent’s conduct was inadvertent and did not have a significant adverse impact on his employer. He is entitled to unemployment benefits. We reverse.

3. Derek Browen, Relator, vs. Thompson Construction of Princeton and Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondents.  A13-1392.  Filed May 19, 2014

Summary and Outcome:

Relator Derek Browen challenges the decision of the unemployment-law judge (ULJ) dismissing his request for reconsideration as untimely. Because Browen did not file his request within the 20-day period, the ULJ properly dismissed the appeal and we affirm.

Relator also challenges the ULJ’s determination that he refused an offer of suitable employment. DEED concedes that the ULJ erred in its determination on this issue. Browen did not accept reemployment due to his union activities. See Minn. Stat. § 268.035, subd. 23a(g)(3) (2012) (stating that “suitable employment” is not employment 
that would require an applicant to resign from his or her labor organization). However, because we have affirmed the ULJ’s determination that Browen quit his employment and was not entitled to benefits in the first place, the suitable-employment issue is moot and we will not address it.

Minnesota Supreme Court:  

The Minnesota Supreme Court has not yet issued its decisions for this week, and did not issue any decisions on unemployment benefits last week.

May 21, 2014 Update - the Minnesota Supreme Court did not issue any opinions on unemployment benefits this week.
 



 


Comments

04/06/2015 1:09am

By studying medical study people can become doctors, surgeons. They can contribute a lot for the people of their country and for the people of the world. They can treat patients and can give them life or they can save their life.

Reply
04/06/2016 3:52am

Interesting decisions. I like them.

Reply
04/29/2016 12:45am

Thanks for sharing that summary of decisions of the Minnesota Court of Appeals and Minnesota Supreme Court on unemployment benefits!

Reply
05/25/2016 7:25am

this is actually fantastic, one-of-a-kind as well as very insightful article, i like it. many thanks

Reply

I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own BlogEngine blog now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is a fine example of it.

Reply
08/08/2016 1:11am

I think you are unequivocally right. I was satisfied starting late when I got one of our understudies say, "I like it here in light of the way that your not a pack of eggheads." We no two ways about it select aides who can add to a positive proclivity with the student.Nice to assess that such engineering focuses are the spot to be, in light of the route that if all else fails, most understudies don't fit the setup of get readied. Particularly now in the modernized time, schools require better ways to deal with oversee direct get readied. An insurance of appreciation is all together for the article.

Reply

I intend to thank you for posting such an instructional blog site. And will certainly await your following blog post.

Reply

Reply



Leave a Reply